Three in Five Of Us Now Ask AI What’s Wrong

If you’ve ever fed a handful of symptoms into a chatbot and waited for it to tell you you’re either “fine” or “finished,” you’re in crowded company: health self-diagnosis with AI has become a very British coping mechanism—somewhere between waiting politely and panicking quietly.

New research from Confused.com Life Insurance says 3 in 5 (59%) Brits are already using AI tools to self-diagnose health issues, with another 35% saying they’re likely to try it in future. (1) In other words, the nation has discovered a shortcut—whether it leads to reassurance, confusion, or a dramatic late-night “I’m definitely dying” group chat remains the open question.

The 19-day GP wait and the new “doctor” in your pocket

The backdrop is plain enough: the average waiting time for a GP appointment in the UK is currently 19 days. (2) That’s long enough for a sore throat to become a saga, and for a harmless ache to grow into a full-blown theory of doom.

Unsurprisingly, searches have spiked since January 2025 for phrases like “what is my illness?” (85%), “what are the symptoms for” (33%), and “side effects” (22%). (3) When the diary says “two weeks,” the internet says “two seconds”—and speed, as ever, is seductive.

What We’re asking AI about Our health

The research lays out what people actually want from AI, and it’s less “diagnose me” and more “help me make sense of this.”

• Symptom checks lead the charge: 63% are using AI to explore physical or mental effects they’re feeling.
• Side effects come next at 50%—often the anxious companion of a new prescription, supplement, or stubborn condition.
• Wellbeing techniques (diet and fitness) sit at 38%, which sounds wholesome until you remember some of those “wellbeing” rabbit holes have no bottom.
• Treatment options such as medication and surgery are searched by 30%.
• Mental health support—therapy ideas and coping strategies—registers at 20%.

This is the heart of modern health self-diagnosis: not necessarily replacing medicine, but attempting to translate the body’s messy signals into something coherent.

Who’s using it most (and who’s catching up fast)

The headline stereotype might be “young people and their phones,” and yes—18–24-year-olds are heavy users, with more than three-quarters (85%) regularly searching. But the story is bigger than that.

More than a third (35%) of people aged 65 and over are also using AI for self-diagnosis, with 54% checking symptoms. It’s not a generational quirk anymore; it’s becoming part of how people manage uncertainty—especially when appointments feel distant and time feels expensive.

Does it actually help—or just fuel the spiral?

Here’s where it gets interesting. In the research, 1 in 10 (11%) say using AI to self-diagnose helped improve their condition “a great deal.” Meanwhile 41% say it helped “somewhat.” Only 9% said it didn’t help at all.

If you’re looking for the practical takeaway, it may be this: AI seems to be acting as a nudge—sometimes towards reassurance, sometimes towards action, and sometimes towards seeing a professional with better questions in hand. The danger is when self-diagnosis becomes a substitute for clinical judgment rather than a stepping stone to it.

There are also notable differences by identity: three-quarters (75%) of non-binary people or those with an alternative identity said the diagnosis helped “a great deal,” compared with 9% of women and 13% of men.

The appeal: speed, privacy, and “just tell me what this is”

The motivations are human, not trendy.

• 42% say AI is quicker than waiting for a doctor’s appointment.
• Timing anxiety peaks among 25–34-year-olds (50%) and 35–44-year-olds (51%), who don’t like to take chances with delays.
• 20% use AI to help support family members—particularly 35–44-year-olds, where it rises to 30%.
• 24% feel more comfortable using AI than having a face-to-face appointment, jumping to 39% among 18–24-year-olds.
• 17% are actively seeking alternative advice and solutions, especially 25–34-year-olds (27%).

Speed and privacy are powerful forces. When you’re worried, tired, or embarrassed, an always-available screen can feel easier than a waiting room. That is precisely why this trend will keep growing—regardless of what anyone thinks “should” happen.

The risk: confidence without certainty

There’s a hard truth here: AI can be fluent, plausible, and wrong. It can also be right for the wrong reasons. And in medicine, that distinction matters.

Tom Vaughan, life insurance expert at Confused.com, puts it bluntly—and his warning is the sensible anchor in a sea of digital reassurance:

“Advances in AI technology have created a new way for people to approach healthcare and self-diagnosis. More individuals are taking steps to support their own and their family’s wellbeing, getting ahead of health concerns and addressing situations as quickly as possible.

“While AI can be useful for initial research and gaining an understanding of a condition, it’s clear that for the ultimate peace of mind people should consult a GP or pharmacist. GPs and other medical professionals are the only people who can accurately diagnose conditions, some of which may worsen or become long-term illnesses without the proper treatment.

“For further health reassurance, applying for a life insurance policy can help safeguard families in case any health issues do occur. Critical illness and varied cover options can ensure people are supported in situations where conditions progress or require major treatment, easing stress during what can be an overwhelming time.

“Some providers even offer virtual GPs as part of their life insurance offerings, giving policyholders access to a doctor whenever they need one via video or phone calls. Whilst they may not always be able to issue a diagnosis, they can help with prescriptions and referrals, giving you an efficient and convenient way of having a potential problem investigated quickly.”

That’s the balanced view: use AI to get oriented, then take the map to someone who can actually read the terrain.

Where life insurance and virtual GPs fit into the picture

The research also points to a growing “support stack” around healthcare: people want faster pathways to advice, reassurance, and next steps. Some life insurance policies now bundle virtual GP access, which may help reduce the lag between “I’m worried” and “I’ve spoken to someone qualified.”

It won’t replace in-person care, and it shouldn’t pretend to. But as health self-diagnosis becomes more common, services that shorten the gap to professional input are likely to become more attractive—not least for people juggling family responsibilities, shift work, or anxiety about appointments.

---

FAQs

Is using AI for health self-diagnosis reliable?
AI can help you understand symptoms and prepare questions, but it cannot confirm a diagnosis. Use it as a starting point, not a verdict.

Why are so many people using AI for symptom checks now?
Speed, convenience, and appointment waiting times are major drivers, alongside privacy and comfort for sensitive topics.

What should I do if an AI tool suggests something serious?
Treat it as a prompt to seek professional advice—GP, pharmacist, or urgent services if symptoms are severe or worsening.

Can AI replace a GP appointment?
No. AI may help with initial research, but only qualified medical professionals can diagnose and treat conditions safely.